Maquereaux vin blanc et aromates vs Filets de maquereau au vins blanc et aux aromates
Overall, Filets de maquereau au vins blanc et aux aromates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Maquereaux vin blanc et aromates
Filets de maquereau au vins blanc et aux aromates
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Maquereaux vin blanc et arom... | Filets de maquereau au vins... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 158 kcal | 137 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 9.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 12.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets de maquereau au vins blanc et aux aromates has 13% fewer calories (137 kcal vs 158 kcal).
- Filets de maquereau au vins blanc et aux aromates has 22% less fat (9.4 g vs 12 g).
- Filets de maquereau au vins blanc et aux aromates has 21% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 2.8 g).
Ingredients
Maquereaux vin blanc et aromates
AU VIN BLANC ET AUX AROMATES
Filets de maquereau au vins blanc et aux aromates
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Maquereaux vin blanc et aromates or Filets de maquereau au vins blanc et aux aromates?
Overall, Filets de maquereau au vins blanc et aux aromates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de maquereau au vins blanc et aux aromates has fewer calories: 137 kcal versus 158 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Maquereaux vin blanc et aromates has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.