Maple Turkey Bacon vs Fingers de poulet
Overall, Fingers de poulet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Maple Turkey Bacon | Fingers de poulet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 179 kcal | 93 kcal |
| Fat | 7.1 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 3.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 3.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 5 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fingers de poulet has 48% fewer calories (93 kcal vs 179 kcal).
- Fingers de poulet has 82% less fat (1.3 g vs 7.1 g).
- Fingers de poulet has 50% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 1.8 g).
- Fingers de poulet has 86% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.6 g).
- Maple Turkey Bacon has 37% less salt (2 g vs 3.1 g).
- Maple Turkey Bacon has 11% more protein (21.4 g vs 19 g).
- Only Fingers de poulet lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Maple Turkey Bacon
Turkey thigh, turkey, water, sugar, potassium lactate, salt, natural maple flavor, sugar, natural flavors, maple syrup, sodium phosphate, sodium diacetate, sodium erythorbate, sodium nitrite
Fingers de poulet
70% viande de poulet halal* traitée en salaison (filet et peau de poulet), eau, gluten de blé, dextrose, sel, arômes, antioxydant: E316, panure 25% (farine de blé, eau, sel, levures et épices), huile végétale 5% (huile de tournesol)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Maple Turkey Bacon or Fingers de poulet?
Overall, Fingers de poulet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fingers de poulet has fewer calories: 93 kcal versus 179 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fingers de poulet has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.