Comparison
Malesan Rouge vs Bordeaux 2013
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Malesan Rouge | Bordeaux 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 11 kcal | 11 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Only Bordeaux 2013 lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Malesan Rouge
Vin rouge de Bordeaux
Bordeaux 2013
Vin rouge (_Sulfites_).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Malesan Rouge or Bordeaux 2013?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Malesan Rouge has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 11 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Malesan Rouge has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Bordeaux 2013 vs Leo De La Gaffeliere Aoc...
Bordeaux 2014 "Cour... vs Bordeaux 2013
Bordeaux 2013 vs La petite chapelle de Bo...
Bordeaux 2013 vs Bordeaux 2018
Bordeaux 2013 vs Vin Bordeaux Rouge Bio A...
Bordeaux 2013 vs Bordeaux Réserve 2014
Bordeaux 2014 "Cour... vs Malesan Rouge
Malesan Rouge vs La petite chapelle de Bo...