Comparison

Bordeaux 2013 vs La petite chapelle de Bordeaux 2015

Overall, Bordeaux 2013 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientBordeaux 2013La petite chapelle de Bordea...
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 11 kcal 111 kcal
Fat 0 g 11 g
Saturated fat 0 g 4 g
Sugars 0.6 g 1 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0.1 g 0 g
Additives00
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bordeaux 2013 has 90% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 111 kcal).
  • Bordeaux 2013 has no fat, while La petite chapelle de Bordeaux 2015 has 11 g.
  • Bordeaux 2013 has no saturated fat, while La petite chapelle de Bordeaux 2015 has 4 g.
  • Bordeaux 2013 has 38% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1 g).
  • Only Bordeaux 2013 lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Bordeaux 2013

Vin rouge (_Sulfites_).

La petite chapelle de Bordeaux 2015

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bordeaux 2013 or La petite chapelle de Bordeaux 2015?

Overall, Bordeaux 2013 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bordeaux 2013 has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 111 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bordeaux 2013 has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons