Bordeaux 2013 vs La petite chapelle de Bordeaux 2015
Overall, Bordeaux 2013 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Bordeaux 2013
La petite chapelle de Bordeaux 2015
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Bordeaux 2013 | La petite chapelle de Bordea... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 11 kcal | 111 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bordeaux 2013 has 90% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 111 kcal).
- Bordeaux 2013 has no fat, while La petite chapelle de Bordeaux 2015 has 11 g.
- Bordeaux 2013 has no saturated fat, while La petite chapelle de Bordeaux 2015 has 4 g.
- Bordeaux 2013 has 38% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1 g).
- Only Bordeaux 2013 lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Bordeaux 2013
Vin rouge (_Sulfites_).
La petite chapelle de Bordeaux 2015
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bordeaux 2013 or La petite chapelle de Bordeaux 2015?
Overall, Bordeaux 2013 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bordeaux 2013 has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 111 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bordeaux 2013 has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1 g per 100 g.