Maes Radler Citroen 0.0% Cans 33CL 6-pack vs Schous Lite, 4,3%
Overall, Schous Lite, 4,3% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Maes Radler Citroen 0.0% Cans 33CL 6-pack
Schous Lite, 4,3%
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Maes Radler Citroen 0.0% Can... | Schous Lite, 4,3% |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 28 kcal | 28 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 5.6 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schous Lite, 4,3% has 98% less sugar (0.1 g vs 5.6 g).
- Schous Lite, 4,3% has 100% more protein (0.4 g vs 0 g).
- Only Schous Lite, 4,3% lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Maes Radler Citroen 0.0% Cans 33CL 6-pack
Eau pétillante, mai d'orge, sucre, jus de fruits à base de concentré (Jus de citron 2,7%, jus d'orange, jus de citron vert, Jus d'acerola), houblon, extrait de houblon, arômes naturels, extrait de citron concentré stabilisant: farine de graines de caroube.
Schous Lite, 4,3%
VANN, MALTET BYGG, HUMLE, HUMLEOLJE OG NATURLIG AROMA
FAQ
Which is healthier: Maes Radler Citroen 0.0% Cans 33CL 6-pack or Schous Lite, 4,3%?
Overall, Schous Lite, 4,3% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Maes Radler Citroen 0.0% Cans 33CL 6-pack has fewer calories: 28 kcal versus 28 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schous Lite, 4,3% has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 5.6 g per 100 g.