Radeberger Pilsner vs Maes Radler Citroen 0.0% Cans 33CL 6-pack
Overall, Radeberger Pilsner has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Radeberger Pilsner
Maes Radler Citroen 0.0% Cans 33CL 6-pack
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Radeberger Pilsner | Maes Radler Citroen 0.0% Can... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 41 kcal | 28 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 5.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Maes Radler Citroen 0.0% Cans 33CL 6-pack has 32% fewer calories (28 kcal vs 41 kcal).
- Radeberger Pilsner has 91% less sugar (0.5 g vs 5.6 g).
- Radeberger Pilsner has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Radeberger Pilsner is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Radeberger Pilsner lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Radeberger Pilsner
Wasser, Gerstenmalz, Hopfen
Maes Radler Citroen 0.0% Cans 33CL 6-pack
Eau pétillante, mai d'orge, sucre, jus de fruits à base de concentré (Jus de citron 2,7%, jus d'orange, jus de citron vert, Jus d'acerola), houblon, extrait de houblon, arômes naturels, extrait de citron concentré stabilisant: farine de graines de caroube.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Radeberger Pilsner or Maes Radler Citroen 0.0% Cans 33CL 6-pack?
Overall, Radeberger Pilsner has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Maes Radler Citroen 0.0% Cans 33CL 6-pack has fewer calories: 28 kcal versus 41 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Radeberger Pilsner has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 5.6 g per 100 g.