Comparison

Radeberger Pilsner vs Schous Lite, 4,3%

Overall, Schous Lite, 4,3% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Radeberger Pilsner

Radeberger Pilsner

Radeberger · 0.5l
NOVA 3
Better choice
Schous Lite, 4,3%

Schous Lite, 4,3%

Rignes AS · 500 ml
NOVA 4

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientRadeberger PilsnerSchous Lite, 4,3%
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 41 kcal 28 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.1 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0.5 g 0.4 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Schous Lite, 4,3% has 32% fewer calories (28 kcal vs 41 kcal).
  • Schous Lite, 4,3% has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Radeberger Pilsner is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Radeberger Pilsner

Wasser, Gerstenmalz, Hopfen

Schous Lite, 4,3%

VANN, MALTET BYGG, HUMLE, HUMLEOLJE OG NATURLIG AROMA

FAQ

Which is healthier: Radeberger Pilsner or Schous Lite, 4,3%?

Overall, Schous Lite, 4,3% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Schous Lite, 4,3% has fewer calories: 28 kcal versus 41 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Schous Lite, 4,3% has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Radeberger Pilsner vs Beer 4,5% Beer 4,5% vs Schous Lite, 4,3% Carlsberg 33 cl Carlsber... vs Radeberger Pilsner Radeberger Pilsner vs Kaiser pilsner 330ml Radeberger Pilsner vs Maes Radler Citroen 0.0%... Radeberger Pilsner vs Brooklyn Pilsner Crisp L... Radeberger Pilsner vs Carlsberg Export Carlsberg 33 cl Carlsber... vs Schous Lite, 4,3%