Comparison
Mâche vs Canónigos
Overall, Canónigos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mâche | Canónigos |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 14 kcal | 14 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 1.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Canónigos has 50% less sugar (0.3 g vs 0.6 g).
- Mâche has 17% more fiber (1.8 g vs 1.5 g).
- Canónigos has 37% more protein (1.8 g vs 1.1 g).
Ingredients
Mâche
Not available.
Canónigos
Canónigo.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mâche or Canónigos?
Overall, Canónigos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Canónigos has fewer calories: 14 kcal versus 14 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Canónigos has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.