Comparison
Mâche vs Canónigos
Overall, Mâche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mâche | Canónigos |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 27 kcal | 14 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 2.2 g | 1.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Canónigos has 48% fewer calories (14 kcal vs 27 kcal).
- Mâche has no fat, while Canónigos has 0.4 g.
- Mâche has no sugar, while Canónigos has 0.3 g.
- Mâche has 50% more fiber (3 g vs 1.5 g).
- Mâche has 18% more protein (2.2 g vs 1.8 g).
Ingredients
Mâche
Mâche
Canónigos
Canónigo.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mâche or Canónigos?
Overall, Mâche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Canónigos has fewer calories: 14 kcal versus 27 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mâche has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.