Comparison

Lulu l ourson vs Tam Tam L'Original

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLulu l oursonTam Tam L'Original
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 391 kcal 433 kcal
Fat 16 g 22.2 g
Saturated fat 3.3 g 2.9 g
Sugars 31 g 33.1 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.9 g
Fiber 1.8 g 1.8 g
Protein 5.2 g 4.7 g
Additives96
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Milk, SoybeansEggs, Gluten, Milk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lulu l ourson has 28% less fat (16 g vs 22.2 g).
  • Tam Tam L'Original has 12% less saturated fat (2.9 g vs 3.3 g).

Ingredients

Lulu l ourson

Farine de _blé_ 23,7%, sirop de glucose-fructose, _œufs_ 12,3%, sucre, huile de colza 11,2%, chocolat noir 6,1% [pâte de cacao, sucre, cacao maigre en poudre, émulsifiant (lécithine de _soja_), arôme], stabilisant (glycérol), _lait_ écrémé 3,4% et entier 2,2% en poudre (équivalent _lait_ 53%), amidon de _blé_, poudre à lever (diphosphate disodique, carbonate acide de sodium), émulsifiants (E472b, E475, lécithine de _soja_), sel, cacao maigre en poudre, arômes.

Tam Tam L'Original

Sucre, huile de colza, œufs 17%, farine de blé 15%, sirop de glucose, chocolat en poudre 4.8% (sucre, cacao en poudre), stabilisants: glycérol et sorbitols, chocolat 3.7% (sucre, pâte de cacao, beurre de cacao, émulsifiant : lecithines (soja)), lait, amidons, farine de riz, poudres à lever: carbonates et citrates de sodium (blé), arôme, sel. Traces éventuelles de: fruits à coque.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lulu l ourson or Tam Tam L'Original?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lulu l ourson has fewer calories: 391 kcal versus 433 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lulu l ourson has less sugar: 31 g versus 33.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons