L'original vs Lurpak
Overall, L'original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | L'original | Lurpak |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 2 |
| Calories | 191 kcal | 747 kcal |
| Fat | 21.2 g | 82 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.4 g | 53 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 6 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- L'original has 74% fewer calories (191 kcal vs 747 kcal).
- L'original has 74% less fat (21.2 g vs 82 g).
- L'original has 80% less saturated fat (10.4 g vs 53 g).
- L'original has no sugar, while Lurpak has 0.7 g.
- Lurpak has 98% less salt (0 g vs 0.6 g).
- Lurpak has 100% more protein (0.6 g vs 0 g).
- L'original has the better Nutri-Score.
- Lurpak is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only L'original lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
L'original
Eau, huiles et stéarine végétales 44% (colza, coprah, palme), beurre (LAIT) 10%, sel 1,5%, émulsifiant (lécithine de SOJA), correcteur d'acidité (acide lactique), conservateur (sorbate de potassium), arôme naturel, colorant (bêta-carotène). Traces éventuelles d'ARACHIDES.
Lurpak
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: L'original or Lurpak?
Overall, L'original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
L'original has fewer calories: 191 kcal versus 747 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
L'original has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.