Comparison

Lomo adobado de cerdo familiar vs Carrefour Hache de Poulet

Overall, Lomo adobado de cerdo familiar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLomo adobado de cerdo famili...Carrefour Hache de Poulet
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 117 kcal 152 kcal
Fat 3.6 g 7.3 g
Saturated fat 1.4 g 1.9 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.7 g 1.9 g
Fiber 0.1 g 0 g
Protein 20.4 g 19 g
Additives53
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lomo adobado de cerdo familiar has 23% fewer calories (117 kcal vs 152 kcal).
  • Lomo adobado de cerdo familiar has 51% less fat (3.6 g vs 7.3 g).
  • Lomo adobado de cerdo familiar has 27% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Lomo adobado de cerdo familiar has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Lomo adobado de cerdo familiar

lomo de cerdo 90%, agua, sal, azúcar, especias, pimentón, antioxidante E301, antioxidante E331, estabilizante E451, estabilizante E452, conservador E250, conservador E252.

Carrefour Hache de Poulet

Viande de poulet 93.7% , conservateur: (lactate de sodium) 3.8% , sel marin réduit en sodium, amidon de tapioca, sirop de glucose, épices, arôme naturel, antioxydant (acide ascorbique), arôme, acide alimentaire (acide citrique), boyau naturel de mouton . Peut contenir des traces de gluten, soja, lait, céleri, moutarde

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lomo adobado de cerdo familiar or Carrefour Hache de Poulet?

Overall, Lomo adobado de cerdo familiar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lomo adobado de cerdo familiar has fewer calories: 117 kcal versus 152 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lomo adobado de cerdo familiar has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons