Comparison
Lippische Palme Bio Grünkohl vs Grünkohl
Overall, Grünkohl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lippische Palme Bio Grünkohl | Grünkohl |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 44 kcal | 28 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 3.7 g | 3.5 g |
| Protein | 4.3 g | 2.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Grünkohl has 36% fewer calories (28 kcal vs 44 kcal).
- Grünkohl has 33% less fat (0.6 g vs 0.9 g).
- Grünkohl has 80% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Grünkohl has no sugar, while Lippische Palme Bio Grünkohl has 0.5 g.
- Grünkohl has 67% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Lippische Palme Bio Grünkohl has 44% more protein (4.3 g vs 2.4 g).
Ingredients
Lippische Palme Bio Grünkohl
Grünkohl aus kontrolliert biologischem Anbau,Wasser, Meersalz
Grünkohl
Grünkohl, Wasser, Salz
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lippische Palme Bio Grünkohl or Grünkohl?
Overall, Grünkohl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Grünkohl has fewer calories: 28 kcal versus 44 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Grünkohl has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.