Lindor noir vs Chocolat noir Pâte d'amande
Overall, Chocolat noir Pâte d'amande has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lindor noir | Chocolat noir Pâte d'amande |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 617 kcal | 464 kcal |
| Fat | 47 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 33 g | 7 g |
| Sugars | 38 g | 54 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 4.8 g |
| Protein | 4.7 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 2 | 5 |
| Allergens | Milk, Nuts, Soybeans | Milk, Nuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chocolat noir Pâte d'amande has 25% fewer calories (464 kcal vs 617 kcal).
- Chocolat noir Pâte d'amande has 53% less fat (22 g vs 47 g).
- Chocolat noir Pâte d'amande has 79% less saturated fat (7 g vs 33 g).
- Lindor noir has 30% less sugar (38 g vs 54 g).
- Chocolat noir Pâte d'amande has 22% more protein (6 g vs 4.7 g).
Ingredients
Lindor noir
Sucre, pâte de cacao, matière grasse végétale (coprah, karité), beurre laitier concentré, beurre de cacao, poudre de lait, lactose, émulsifiant (lécithine de soja), amandes, noisettes, poudre de lait écrémé, arôme (vanille), arômes, arôme naturel de vanille.
Chocolat noir Pâte d'amande
Sucre, amandes (24%), pâte de cacao, humectant (sirop de sorbitol), beurre de cacao, sirop de glucose,beurre concentré, émulsifiant (lécithine de soja), arôme, stabilisant (invertase), lai écrémé en poudre,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lindor noir or Chocolat noir Pâte d'amande?
Overall, Chocolat noir Pâte d'amande has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chocolat noir Pâte d'amande has fewer calories: 464 kcal versus 617 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lindor noir has less sugar: 38 g versus 54 g per 100 g.