Comparison

Liégeois Café Arabica vs Gourmand & Végétal Liégeois au Café

Overall, Gourmand & Végétal Liégeois au Café has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLiégeois Café ArabicaGourmand & Végétal Liégeois...
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 218 kcal 142 kcal
Fat 17 g 7.2 g
Saturated fat 11 g 5.7 g
Sugars 12 g 13.4 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 0.6 g
Protein 3.1 g 0.6 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Gourmand & Végétal Liégeois au Café has 35% fewer calories (142 kcal vs 218 kcal).
  • Gourmand & Végétal Liégeois au Café has 58% less fat (7.2 g vs 17 g).
  • Gourmand & Végétal Liégeois au Café has 48% less saturated fat (5.7 g vs 11 g).
  • Liégeois Café Arabica has 10% less sugar (12 g vs 13.4 g).
  • Liégeois Café Arabica has 81% more protein (3.1 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Gourmand & Végétal Liégeois au Café has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Gourmand & Végétal Liégeois au Café lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Liégeois Café Arabica

Not available.

Gourmand & Végétal Liégeois au Café

Lait d'AMANDE 54%, lait de coco allégé, sucre, crème de coco, amidon, huile de coco, café soluble 0,6%, arôme naturel de café, caramel, carraghénanes, farine de graines de caroube, mono et diglycérides d'acides gras, sel, arôme naturel de vanille,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Liégeois Café Arabica or Gourmand & Végétal Liégeois au Café?

Overall, Gourmand & Végétal Liégeois au Café has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Gourmand & Végétal Liégeois au Café has fewer calories: 142 kcal versus 218 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Liégeois Café Arabica has less sugar: 12 g versus 13.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons