Comparison

Les Pyrénéens vs Schoko-bons

Overall, Schoko-bons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLes PyrénéensSchoko-bons
Nutri-Score e —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 681 kcal 569 kcal
Fat 58 g 36.2 g
Saturated fat 42 g 20.7 g
Sugars 33 g 51.7 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.3 g
Fiber 0 g 2.4 g
Protein 4.2 g 8.6 g
Additives23
AllergensMilk, Nuts, SoybeansMilk, Nuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Schoko-bons has 16% fewer calories (569 kcal vs 681 kcal).
  • Schoko-bons has 38% less fat (36.2 g vs 58 g).
  • Schoko-bons has 51% less saturated fat (20.7 g vs 42 g).
  • Les Pyrénéens has 36% less sugar (33 g vs 51.7 g).
  • Schoko-bons has 100% more fiber (2.4 g vs 0 g).
  • Schoko-bons has 51% more protein (8.6 g vs 4.2 g).

Ingredients

Les Pyrénéens

copra vegetable fat, sugar, cocoa butter, cocoa paste, milk powder, lactose, hazelnut oil, concentrated dairy butter, skim milk powder, hazelnuts, almonds, emulsifier (soy lecithin), flavors, salt, natural vanilla flavor,

Schoko-bons

Chocolat supérieur au LAIT 50% (sucre, LAIT en poudre, beurre de cacao, pâte de cacao, émulsifiants: lecithines [SOJA], vanilline), sucre, LAIT écrémé en poudre 12,5%, huile de palme, NOISETTES 5,8%, BEURRE concentré, chocolat noir (sucre, pâte de cacao, beurre de cacao, émulsifiants: lecithines [SOJA]; vanilline), agent d'enrobage: gomme arabique; sirop de glucose, émulsifiants: lécithines [SOJA]; vanilline.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Les Pyrénéens or Schoko-bons?

Overall, Schoko-bons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Schoko-bons has fewer calories: 569 kcal versus 681 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Les Pyrénéens has less sugar: 33 g versus 51.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons