Les accessibles--cuisses de poulet avec dos vs Kyllingeunderlår
Overall, Les accessibles--cuisses de poulet avec dos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Les accessibles--cuisses de poulet avec dos
Kyllingeunderlår
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Les accessibles--cuisses de... | Kyllingeunderlår |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 106 kcal | 120 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 4.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Les accessibles--cuisses de poulet avec dos has 12% fewer calories (106 kcal vs 120 kcal).
- Les accessibles--cuisses de poulet avec dos has 66% less fat (1.5 g vs 4.4 g).
- Les accessibles--cuisses de poulet avec dos has 60% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1 g).
- Les accessibles--cuisses de poulet avec dos has 13% more protein (23 g vs 20 g).
Ingredients
Les accessibles--cuisses de poulet avec dos
Not available.
Kyllingeunderlår
Chicken thigh
FAQ
Which is healthier: Les accessibles--cuisses de poulet avec dos or Kyllingeunderlår?
Overall, Les accessibles--cuisses de poulet avec dos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Les accessibles--cuisses de poulet avec dos has fewer calories: 106 kcal versus 120 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Les accessibles--cuisses de poulet avec dos has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.