Comparison
Cuisses de poulet vs Kyllingeunderlår
Overall, Kyllingeunderlår has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cuisses de poulet | Kyllingeunderlår |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 173 kcal | 120 kcal |
| Fat | 10.1 g | 4.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20.2 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kyllingeunderlår has 31% fewer calories (120 kcal vs 173 kcal).
- Kyllingeunderlår has 56% less fat (4.4 g vs 10.1 g).
- Kyllingeunderlår has 64% less saturated fat (1 g vs 2.8 g).
- Only Cuisses de poulet lists: None.
Ingredients
Cuisses de poulet
Poulet
Kyllingeunderlår
Chicken thigh
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cuisses de poulet or Kyllingeunderlår?
Overall, Kyllingeunderlår has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kyllingeunderlår has fewer calories: 120 kcal versus 173 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kyllingeunderlår has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.