Leche condensada vs Sweetened Condensed Milk
Overall, Sweetened Condensed Milk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Leche condensada | Sweetened Condensed Milk |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 322 kcal | 322 kcal |
| Fat | 8 g | 8 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.7 g | 5 g |
| Sugars | 55 g | 55 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 7.4 g | 7.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sweetened Condensed Milk has 12% less saturated fat (5 g vs 5.7 g).
- Only Sweetened Condensed Milk lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Leche condensada
Leite e açúcar. Matéria gorda: 8% mín. Resíduo seco isento de matéria gorda proveniente do leite: 20%. Origem do leite: Espanha.
Sweetened Condensed Milk
whole milk & sugar
FAQ
Which is healthier: Leche condensada or Sweetened Condensed Milk?
Overall, Sweetened Condensed Milk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Leche condensada has fewer calories: 322 kcal versus 322 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Leche condensada has less sugar: 55 g versus 55 g per 100 g.