Comparison
Lapin lindt vs Schokohase Zartbitter
Overall, Lapin lindt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lapin lindt | Schokohase Zartbitter |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 544 kcal | 546 kcal |
| Fat | 32 g | 38 g |
| Saturated fat | 19 g | 24 g |
| Sugars | 54 g | 40 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 7.2 g | 6.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lapin lindt has 16% less fat (32 g vs 38 g).
- Lapin lindt has 21% less saturated fat (19 g vs 24 g).
- Schokohase Zartbitter has 26% less sugar (40 g vs 54 g).
- Lapin lindt has 11% more protein (7.2 g vs 6.4 g).
Ingredients
Lapin lindt
Not available.
Schokohase Zartbitter
Kakaomasse, Zucker, Kakaobutter, Emulgator: Lecithine; Vanilleextrakt.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lapin lindt or Schokohase Zartbitter?
Overall, Lapin lindt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lapin lindt has fewer calories: 544 kcal versus 546 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schokohase Zartbitter has less sugar: 40 g versus 54 g per 100 g.