Comparison
Goldhase Weiß vs Lapin lindt
Overall, Lapin lindt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Goldhase Weiß | Lapin lindt |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 561 kcal | 544 kcal |
| Fat | 35 g | 32 g |
| Saturated fat | 22 g | 19 g |
| Sugars | 55 g | 54 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | — |
| Protein | 6.5 g | 7.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lapin lindt has 14% less saturated fat (19 g vs 22 g).
- Only Goldhase Weiß lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Goldhase Weiß
Zucker, Kakaobutter, Vollmilchpulver, Magermilchpulver,Emulgator (Sojalecithin), Aroma Vanillin
Lapin lindt
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Goldhase Weiß or Lapin lindt?
Overall, Lapin lindt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lapin lindt has fewer calories: 544 kcal versus 561 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lapin lindt has less sugar: 54 g versus 55 g per 100 g.