Comparison
Lapin lindt vs Osterhase
Overall, Lapin lindt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lapin lindt | Osterhase |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 544 kcal | 559 kcal |
| Fat | 32 g | 33 g |
| Saturated fat | 19 g | 20 g |
| Sugars | 54 g | 61 g |
| Salt | — | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 7.2 g | 4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lapin lindt has 11% less sugar (54 g vs 61 g).
- Lapin lindt has 44% more protein (7.2 g vs 4 g).
- Only Osterhase lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Lapin lindt
Not available.
Osterhase
Zucker, Kakaobutter, Magermilchpulver, Süssmolkenpulver, (aus MILCH), BUTTERREINFETT, Emulgator (Sojalecithine), Aromen
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lapin lindt or Osterhase?
Overall, Lapin lindt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lapin lindt has fewer calories: 544 kcal versus 559 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lapin lindt has less sugar: 54 g versus 61 g per 100 g.