Langues de chat - Croustillantes et fondantes vs Langues de chat
Overall, Langues de chat - Croustillantes et fondantes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Langues de chat - Croustillantes et fondantes
Langues de chat
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Langues de chat - Croustilla... | Langues de chat |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 437 kcal | 433 kcal |
| Fat | 11 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 4.9 g |
| Sugars | 45 g | 43 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 1.9 g |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 5.2 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk | Eggs, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Langues de chat - Croustillantes et fondantes has 43% less saturated fat (2.8 g vs 4.9 g).
- Langues de chat - Croustillantes et fondantes has 46% more fiber (3.5 g vs 1.9 g).
Ingredients
Langues de chat - Croustillantes et fondantes
Farine de BLÉ - sucre - huile de tournesol oléique - BEURRE concentré - LACTOSE et PROTÉINES DE LAIT - arôme - sel - dextrose - blancs d'OEUFS en poudre - poudres à lever : . Diphosphates , carbonates de sodium. Traces de FRUITS À COQUE , de SOJA et de GRAINES DE SÉSAME.
Langues de chat
Farine de blé 48%; sucre; graisse de palme; lactose et protéines de lait; arôme; sel; dextrose; blanc d'œuf en poudre 0,2%; poudres à lever: E500, E450. Traces de fruits à coque.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Langues de chat - Croustillantes et fondantes or Langues de chat?
Overall, Langues de chat - Croustillantes et fondantes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Langues de chat has fewer calories: 433 kcal versus 437 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Langues de chat has less sugar: 43 g versus 45 g per 100 g.