Langues de chat vs Langues de chat
Overall, Langues de chat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Langues de chat | Langues de chat |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 433 kcal | 465 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.9 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 43 g | 40 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 5.2 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Langues de chat has 33% less fat (10 g vs 15 g).
- Langues de chat has 18% less saturated fat (4.9 g vs 6 g).
- Langues de chat has no salt, while Langues de chat has 0.6 g.
- Langues de chat has 47% more fiber (1.9 g vs 1 g).
- Langues de chat is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Langues de chat lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Langues de chat
Farine de blé 48%; sucre; graisse de palme; lactose et protéines de lait; arôme; sel; dextrose; blanc d'œuf en poudre 0,2%; poudres à lever: E500, E450. Traces de fruits à coque.
Langues de chat
Sucre de canne roux*, farine de blé*, farine d'épeautre*, beurre*, huile de tournesol*, poudre de lait écrémé*, sel, poudre à lever (carbonates de sodium), correcteurs d'acidité (acide citrique), blancs d'œufs en poudre* *Ingrédients d'origine agricole issus de l'agriculture biologique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Langues de chat or Langues de chat?
Overall, Langues de chat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Langues de chat has fewer calories: 433 kcal versus 465 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Langues de chat has less sugar: 40 g versus 43 g per 100 g.