Langues de chat vs Langues de chat
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Langues de chat | Langues de chat |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 438 kcal | 465 kcal |
| Fat | 11 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.1 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 45 g | 40 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 5.5 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Langues de chat has 27% less fat (11 g vs 15 g).
- Langues de chat has 15% less saturated fat (5.1 g vs 6 g).
- Langues de chat has 11% less sugar (40 g vs 45 g).
- Langues de chat has no salt, while Langues de chat has 0.6 g.
- Langues de chat has 50% more fiber (2 g vs 1 g).
- Langues de chat is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Langues de chat lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Langues de chat
Farine de BLÉ, sucre, graisse de palme, lactose (LAIT) sel, dextrose, arôme, protéines de LAIT, blanc d'OEUF en poudre poudres à lever : diphosphates, carbonates de sodium. Traces éventuelles de fruits à coque, de soja et de graines de sésame.
Langues de chat
Sucre de canne roux*, farine de blé*, farine d'épeautre*, beurre*, huile de tournesol*, poudre de lait écrémé*, sel, poudre à lever (carbonates de sodium), correcteurs d'acidité (acide citrique), blancs d'œufs en poudre* *Ingrédients d'origine agricole issus de l'agriculture biologique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Langues de chat or Langues de chat?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Langues de chat has fewer calories: 438 kcal versus 465 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Langues de chat has less sugar: 40 g versus 45 g per 100 g.