Comparison

Langues de chat vs Biscuit langues de chat

Overall, Langues de chat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLangues de chatBiscuit langues de chat
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 433 kcal 465 kcal
Fat 10 g 16 g
Saturated fat 4.9 g 6.2 g
Sugars 43 g 40 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.4 g
Fiber 1.9 g 1 g
Protein 5.2 g 5.4 g
Additives23
AllergensEggs, Gluten, MilkEggs, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Langues de chat has 38% less fat (10 g vs 16 g).
  • Langues de chat has 21% less saturated fat (4.9 g vs 6.2 g).
  • Langues de chat has 47% more fiber (1.9 g vs 1 g).
  • Biscuit langues de chat is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Langues de chat

Farine de blé 48%; sucre; graisse de palme; lactose et protéines de lait; arôme; sel; dextrose; blanc d'œuf en poudre 0,2%; poudres à lever: E500, E450. Traces de fruits à coque.

Biscuit langues de chat

Sucre de canne roux* 39%, farine de blé* 33% (France), farine de grand épeautre* (blé*) 15% (France), beurre* 10%, huile de tournesol*; lait écrémé en poudre*, sel marin, poudre à lever : Carbonate acide de sodium, correcteur d'acidité : acide citrique, blanc d'oeuf en poudre*

FAQ

Which is healthier: Langues de chat or Biscuit langues de chat?

Overall, Langues de chat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Langues de chat has fewer calories: 433 kcal versus 465 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Biscuit langues de chat has less sugar: 40 g versus 43 g per 100 g.

More comparisons