Langues de chat vs Langues de chat
Overall, Langues de chat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Langues de chat | Langues de chat |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 422 kcal | 465 kcal |
| Fat | 9.7 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.6 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 44 g | 40 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 3 | 2 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Langues de chat has 35% less fat (9.7 g vs 15 g).
- Langues de chat has 23% less saturated fat (4.6 g vs 6 g).
- Langues de chat has no salt, while Langues de chat has 0.7 g.
- Langues de chat has 41% more fiber (1.7 g vs 1 g).
- Langues de chat is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Langues de chat lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Langues de chat
Farine de _blé_, sucre, graisse de palme, _lactose_ et protéines de _lait_, dextrose, sel, arôme, blanc d'_oeufs_ en poudre, poudres à lever : diphosphates et carbonates de sodium. Peut contenir des traces de fruits à coque, de graines de sésame et de soja.
Langues de chat
Sucre de canne roux*, farine de blé*, farine d'épeautre*, beurre*, huile de tournesol*, poudre de lait écrémé*, sel, poudre à lever (carbonates de sodium), correcteurs d'acidité (acide citrique), blancs d'œufs en poudre* *Ingrédients d'origine agricole issus de l'agriculture biologique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Langues de chat or Langues de chat?
Overall, Langues de chat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Langues de chat has fewer calories: 422 kcal versus 465 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Langues de chat has less sugar: 40 g versus 44 g per 100 g.