La Viande chevaline vs Steak de cheval
Overall, Steak de cheval has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | La Viande chevaline | Steak de cheval |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 160 kcal | 102 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 1.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 28 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Steak de cheval has 36% fewer calories (102 kcal vs 160 kcal).
- Steak de cheval has 37% less fat (1.9 g vs 3 g).
- La Viande chevaline has 25% more protein (28 g vs 21 g).
- Steak de cheval has the better Nutri-Score.
- Steak de cheval is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
La Viande chevaline
Viande de Cheval 98%, correcteur d'acidité E331, acidifiants: E2621, E262ii, huile de tournesol oleique, Extrait de Romarin <3% de matière grasse.
Steak de cheval
Viande de cheval.
FAQ
Which is healthier: La Viande chevaline or Steak de cheval?
Overall, Steak de cheval has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Steak de cheval has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 160 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
La Viande chevaline has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.