La Viande chevaline vs Battuta di equino
Overall, La Viande chevaline has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | La Viande chevaline | Battuta di equino |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 160 kcal | 129 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 4.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 2.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 28 g | 22.6 g |
| Additives | 4 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Battuta di equino has 19% fewer calories (129 kcal vs 160 kcal).
- La Viande chevaline has 27% less fat (3 g vs 4.1 g).
- La Viande chevaline has 34% less saturated fat (1 g vs 1.5 g).
- La Viande chevaline has no sugar, while Battuta di equino has 0.3 g.
- La Viande chevaline has 86% less salt (0.3 g vs 2.1 g).
- La Viande chevaline has 19% more protein (28 g vs 22.6 g).
- La Viande chevaline has the better Nutri-Score.
- La Viande chevaline is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
La Viande chevaline
Viande de Cheval 98%, correcteur d'acidité E331, acidifiants: E2621, E262ii, huile de tournesol oleique, Extrait de Romarin <3% de matière grasse.
Battuta di equino
carne di equini, sale, destrosio, conservante: E250-E251, Olio extravergine di oliva, pepe nero macinato
FAQ
Which is healthier: La Viande chevaline or Battuta di equino?
Overall, La Viande chevaline has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Battuta di equino has fewer calories: 129 kcal versus 160 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
La Viande chevaline has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.