Comparison
Kvasa vs Kvass (Unfiltered)
Overall, Kvasa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kvasa | Kvass (Unfiltered) |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 18 kcal | 37 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 5.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kvasa has 51% fewer calories (18 kcal vs 37 kcal).
- Kvasa has 20% less sugar (4.5 g vs 5.6 g).
- Kvasa has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Kvass (Unfiltered) lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Kvasa
Not available.
Kvass (Unfiltered)
Water, sugar, barley malt, rye malt, carbon dioxide, acidity regulator - lactic acid, citric acid, antioxidant-ascorbic acid.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kvasa or Kvass (Unfiltered)?
Overall, Kvasa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kvasa has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 37 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kvasa has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 5.6 g per 100 g.