Küstencola vs Cola Frisdrank
Overall, Cola Frisdrank has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Küstencola | Cola Frisdrank |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 38 kcal | 25 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 9.5 g | 6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 3 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cola Frisdrank has 34% fewer calories (25 kcal vs 38 kcal).
- Cola Frisdrank has 37% less sugar (6 g vs 9.5 g).
- Cola Frisdrank has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Küstencola
Wasser, Zucker, Kohlensäure, Ammonsulfit-Zuckerkulör, Phosphorsäure, Aroma Koffein, natürliches Aroma
Cola Frisdrank
koolzuurhoudend water, suiker, koolhydraten 6,1g, kleurstof (E150d), stabilisator vezels 0 g, eiwitten (E414), voedingszuur (E338, E330), zuurteregelaar (E331), cafeïne,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Küstencola or Cola Frisdrank?
Overall, Cola Frisdrank has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cola Frisdrank has fewer calories: 25 kcal versus 38 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cola Frisdrank has less sugar: 6 g versus 9.5 g per 100 g.