Küstencola vs Comet Cola
Overall, Comet Cola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Küstencola | Comet Cola |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 38 kcal | 35 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 9.5 g | 8.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 3 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Ingredients
Küstencola
Wasser, Zucker, Kohlensäure, Ammonsulfit-Zuckerkulör, Phosphorsäure, Aroma Koffein, natürliches Aroma
Comet Cola
Wasser, Zucker, Kohlensäure, Farbstoff (Ammonsulfit-Zuckerkulör), Säuerungsmittel (Phosphorsäure), Aroma Koffein, natürliches Aroma.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Küstencola or Comet Cola?
Overall, Comet Cola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Comet Cola has fewer calories: 35 kcal versus 38 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Comet Cola has less sugar: 8.7 g versus 9.5 g per 100 g.