Kofola vs Cola Frisdrank
Overall, Cola Frisdrank has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kofola | Cola Frisdrank |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 32 kcal | 25 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | — |
| Sugars | 8 g | 6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 4 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cola Frisdrank has 22% fewer calories (25 kcal vs 32 kcal).
- Cola Frisdrank has no fat, while Kofola has 0.5 g.
- Cola Frisdrank has 25% less sugar (6 g vs 8 g).
- Kofola has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Cola Frisdrank has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kofola
Voda, sirup KOFO® (ovocný sirup, cukr, glukózo-fruktó - zový sirup, voda, karamel, barvivo E150d, kyselina citrónová, chlorid sodný, esence pro KOFO®- aroma, bylinný extrakt - přírodní aroma, lékořicový extrakt - přírodní aroma, kofein, konzervant E211), oxid uhličitý
Cola Frisdrank
koolzuurhoudend water, suiker, koolhydraten 6,1g, kleurstof (E150d), stabilisator vezels 0 g, eiwitten (E414), voedingszuur (E338, E330), zuurteregelaar (E331), cafeïne,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kofola or Cola Frisdrank?
Overall, Cola Frisdrank has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cola Frisdrank has fewer calories: 25 kcal versus 32 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cola Frisdrank has less sugar: 6 g versus 8 g per 100 g.