Kofola vs Royal Crown Cola
Overall, Kofola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Kofola | Royal Crown Cola |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 32 kcal | 45 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 8 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kofola has 29% fewer calories (32 kcal vs 45 kcal).
- Kofola has 27% less sugar (8 g vs 11 g).
- Kofola has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kofola
Voda, sirup KOFO® (ovocný sirup, cukr, glukózo-fruktó - zový sirup, voda, karamel, barvivo E150d, kyselina citrónová, chlorid sodný, esence pro KOFO®- aroma, bylinný extrakt - přírodní aroma, lékořicový extrakt - přírodní aroma, kofein, konzervant E211), oxid uhličitý
Royal Crown Cola
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kofola or Royal Crown Cola?
Overall, Kofola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kofola has fewer calories: 32 kcal versus 45 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kofola has less sugar: 8 g versus 11 g per 100 g.