Original vs Kofola
Overall, Kofola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Original | Kofola |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 42 kcal | 32 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 10.6 g | 8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kofola has 24% fewer calories (32 kcal vs 42 kcal).
- Original has no fat, while Kofola has 0.5 g.
- Kofola has 25% less sugar (8 g vs 10.6 g).
- Kofola has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Kofola has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Original
Sprankelend water, suiker, kleurstof: E150d, voedingszuur: E338, natuurlijke aroma's (plantenextracten), waaronder cafeïne
Kofola
Voda, sirup KOFO® (ovocný sirup, cukr, glukózo-fruktó - zový sirup, voda, karamel, barvivo E150d, kyselina citrónová, chlorid sodný, esence pro KOFO®- aroma, bylinný extrakt - přírodní aroma, lékořicový extrakt - přírodní aroma, kofein, konzervant E211), oxid uhličitý
FAQ
Which is healthier: Original or Kofola?
Overall, Kofola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kofola has fewer calories: 32 kcal versus 42 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kofola has less sugar: 8 g versus 10.6 g per 100 g.