Kritsisnack vs Bâtonnet betroot
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kritsisnack | Bâtonnet betroot |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 437 kcal | 469 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 20.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 3.9 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 4.8 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | 4.9 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 14.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kritsisnack has 28% less fat (15 g vs 20.9 g).
- Kritsisnack has 59% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 3.9 g).
- Kritsisnack has 60% less sugar (1.9 g vs 4.8 g).
- Bâtonnet betroot has 32% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.9 g).
- Bâtonnet betroot has 35% more fiber (4.9 g vs 3.2 g).
- Bâtonnet betroot has 18% more protein (14.7 g vs 12 g).
- Only Bâtonnet betroot lists: Gluten, Nuts.
Ingredients
Kritsisnack
Not available.
Bâtonnet betroot
Αλεύρι σίτου, φρέσκο παντζάρι 30%, Ελληνικό ελαιόλαδο 11%, παραδοσιακό προζύμι, ηλιέλαιο, νερό, μαγιά, αλάτι, φρέσκο σκόρδο, Μπορεί να περιέχει ίχνη από σπόρους σουσαμιού και ξηρούς καρπούς (αμύγδαλα, καρύδια).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kritsisnack or Bâtonnet betroot?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kritsisnack has fewer calories: 437 kcal versus 469 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kritsisnack has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 4.8 g per 100 g.