Kritsinia vs Bâtonnet betroot
Overall, Bâtonnet betroot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kritsinia | Bâtonnet betroot |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 496 kcal | 469 kcal |
| Fat | 28.3 g | 20.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.5 g | 3.9 g |
| Sugars | 4.6 g | 4.8 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 4.9 g |
| Protein | 12.9 g | 14.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bâtonnet betroot has 26% less fat (20.9 g vs 28.3 g).
- Bâtonnet betroot has 48% less saturated fat (3.9 g vs 7.5 g).
- Bâtonnet betroot has 12% more protein (14.7 g vs 12.9 g).
- Bâtonnet betroot has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Bâtonnet betroot lists: Gluten, Nuts.
Ingredients
Kritsinia
Not available.
Bâtonnet betroot
Αλεύρι σίτου, φρέσκο παντζάρι 30%, Ελληνικό ελαιόλαδο 11%, παραδοσιακό προζύμι, ηλιέλαιο, νερό, μαγιά, αλάτι, φρέσκο σκόρδο, Μπορεί να περιέχει ίχνη από σπόρους σουσαμιού και ξηρούς καρπούς (αμύγδαλα, καρύδια).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kritsinia or Bâtonnet betroot?
Overall, Bâtonnet betroot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bâtonnet betroot has fewer calories: 469 kcal versus 496 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kritsinia has less sugar: 4.6 g versus 4.8 g per 100 g.