Comparison
Kritsinia vs Breadsticks
Overall, Breadsticks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kritsinia | Breadsticks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 496 kcal | 474 kcal |
| Fat | 28.3 g | 20.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.5 g | 4.6 g |
| Sugars | 4.6 g | 7.5 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 12.9 g | 13.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Breadsticks has 29% less fat (20.2 g vs 28.3 g).
- Breadsticks has 39% less saturated fat (4.6 g vs 7.5 g).
- Kritsinia has 39% less sugar (4.6 g vs 7.5 g).
- Breadsticks has 48% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.5 g).
- Breadsticks has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kritsinia
Not available.
Breadsticks
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kritsinia or Breadsticks?
Overall, Breadsticks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Breadsticks has fewer calories: 474 kcal versus 496 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kritsinia has less sugar: 4.6 g versus 7.5 g per 100 g.