Comparison
Breadsticks vs Kritsisnack
Overall, Kritsisnack has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Breadsticks | Kritsisnack |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 474 kcal | 437 kcal |
| Fat | 20.2 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.6 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 7.5 g | 1.9 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.2 g |
| Protein | 13.1 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kritsisnack has 26% less fat (15 g vs 20.2 g).
- Kritsisnack has 65% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 4.6 g).
- Kritsisnack has 75% less sugar (1.9 g vs 7.5 g).
- Breadsticks has 61% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.9 g).
Ingredients
Breadsticks
Not available.
Kritsisnack
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Breadsticks or Kritsisnack?
Overall, Kritsisnack has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kritsisnack has fewer calories: 437 kcal versus 474 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kritsisnack has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 7.5 g per 100 g.