Krisprolls vs Krisprolls
Overall, Krisprolls has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Krisprolls | Krisprolls |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 397 kcal | 432 kcal |
| Fat | 6.2 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 7 g | 10 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 7.7 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Krisprolls has 44% less fat (6.2 g vs 11 g).
- Krisprolls has 48% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 4 g).
- Krisprolls has 30% less sugar (7 g vs 10 g).
- Krisprolls has 57% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.6 g).
- Krisprolls has 61% more fiber (7.7 g vs 3 g).
- Krisprolls has 25% more protein (12 g vs 9 g).
Ingredients
Krisprolls
Farine de _blé_ complet (58%), farine de _blé_, sucre, huiles végétales (huile de colza, huile de colza totalement hydrogénée), malt d'_orge_, levure, sel.
Krisprolls
Farine de blé* (90%), sucre, huiles végétales (huile de colza*, huile de colza totalement hydrogénée), malt d'orge, levure, sel,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Krisprolls or Krisprolls?
Overall, Krisprolls has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Krisprolls has fewer calories: 397 kcal versus 432 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Krisprolls has less sugar: 7 g versus 10 g per 100 g.