Kondensmilch gezuckert vs Condensed Milk
Overall, Condensed Milk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kondensmilch gezuckert | Condensed Milk |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 325 kcal | 325 kcal |
| Fat | 8 g | 8 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.4 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 56 g | 56.4 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 6.9 g | 6.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Condensed Milk has no saturated fat, while Kondensmilch gezuckert has 5.4 g.
- Condensed Milk is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Kondensmilch gezuckert
55% VOLLMILCH, 45% Zucker, LAKTOSE
Condensed Milk
Whole Milk, Sugar, Skimmed Milk
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kondensmilch gezuckert or Condensed Milk?
Overall, Condensed Milk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kondensmilch gezuckert has fewer calories: 325 kcal versus 325 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kondensmilch gezuckert has less sugar: 56 g versus 56.4 g per 100 g.