Comparison

Knoppers Einzelpack vs Gullon ostya Kakaó 60g

Overall, Gullon ostya Kakaó 60g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKnoppers EinzelpackGullon ostya Kakaó 60g
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 546 kcal 434 kcal
Fat 32.8 g 22 g
Saturated fat 18.4 g 13 g
Sugars 34.2 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.2 g
Fiber — 3.4 g
Protein 9.2 g 4.4 g
Additives310
AllergensGluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans, Melk, Noten, PindaGluten, Milk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Gullon ostya Kakaó 60g has 21% fewer calories (434 kcal vs 546 kcal).
  • Gullon ostya Kakaó 60g has 33% less fat (22 g vs 32.8 g).
  • Gullon ostya Kakaó 60g has 29% less saturated fat (13 g vs 18.4 g).
  • Gullon ostya Kakaó 60g has 99% less sugar (0.5 g vs 34.2 g).
  • Gullon ostya Kakaó 60g has 73% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Knoppers Einzelpack has 52% more protein (9.2 g vs 4.4 g).
  • Gullon ostya Kakaó 60g has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Knoppers Einzelpack lists: Nuts, Melk, Noten, Pinda.

Ingredients

Knoppers Einzelpack

Zucker, pflanziche Fette (Palm, Shea), Magermilchpulver* (13,5%), Weizenmehl (12,3 %), Haselnüsse (9,1%), Weizenvoll - kornmehl (6,1%), Kakao, Butterreinfett* (2,6%), magerer Kakao, Weizenstärke, Emulgator Lecithine (Soja), Molken - erzeugnis, Sahnepulver (0,2%), Salz, natürliche Aromen, Backtriebmittel Natriumhydrogencarbonat, gemahlene Erdnüsse entspricht zusammen 10% Milchanteil, Kann auch Anteile von Mandel, anderen Nüssen und Ei enthalten.

Gullon ostya Kakaó 60g

crema de chocplate 71% equicorants (maltito isomalt grasa vegetal (palma v galmiste cacao en polvo 9, almidon de trigo, emulgente lecitina de soja, aromaj, trigo harina 28%, grasa vegeta (palma emulgente (soy lecitina, sal, gasificantes (carbonato acido de sooid de amoniol, dyeing (b-carotenor, fuente de fibra, puede contener trazas de frutos y leche, en) wafer filled nuculate , sugar free, ingredients: chocolate flavored filing 71% sweeteners (malgiol , soma, vegetable fat (palm and palm kerne, cocoa powder 9%, wheat starch, emulsifier (soya lecithin), tlavour, wheat four 20%, vegetable fat (palm), emulsifier (soya lecithin, salt, raising agents (sodium and ammonium hydrogen carbonate), b-carotêne color), sourc's of fiber, this product may çontain trace of nuts and milk, (fr) gaufrette fourre , without sucres, ingredients, chocolate taste oven 71% sweeteners (maltitol, isomalti, vegetal fat (palm and palmiel , acao powder 99%, wheat amdon, emulsifier lecithine of soy ar'me, wheat flour 28 fat vegetaie soy ecithine), salt powders to rise (sodium acid carbonate, ammonium acid carbonate), dye (b-carotené, squrce de filores, this product may contain , wafer recheado de creme sabor chocolate com edulcorantes, sem acucares ingredientes, creme sabor chocolate 71% edulcorantes prduntator vegetal (palma e palmiste, caçau em in 9% , amido de trigo, emulsionante lecitina de soy, aràma, farinhà de trigo 28%, gordura vegetal (palma, emulsionante , levedantes (drogenocarbonato de sedig e de amnio), corante (b-caroteno), fonte de fibra, pode conter vestigios frutos de ca-c rija è , hu) kakaos toltot edesitosterrel cukormentes, osszetevak, csokolade zesites krem 71% ledesitszer (malbtol, zomatizi, novenyi zsir (palma és pàlmamag, kakaopor ecti aromal buzaist novenyi zsi palma) , emulge-iszer (sz-jalectin), se, terfogàtn-vel szer (nàtrum-és ammunium-hidrogen-karbortan, 76059373 rtalmaz,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Knoppers Einzelpack or Gullon ostya Kakaó 60g?

Overall, Gullon ostya Kakaó 60g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Gullon ostya Kakaó 60g has fewer calories: 434 kcal versus 546 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Gullon ostya Kakaó 60g has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 34.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons