Klassisk Kebab! vs Kebab de pollo
Overall, Kebab de pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Klassisk Kebab! | Kebab de pollo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 306 kcal | 201 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 13.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 4.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kebab de pollo has 34% fewer calories (201 kcal vs 306 kcal).
- Kebab de pollo has 45% less fat (13.1 g vs 24 g).
- Kebab de pollo has 61% less saturated fat (4.3 g vs 11 g).
- Kebab de pollo has 44% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Klassisk Kebab! has 100% less salt (0 g vs 2.2 g).
- Kebab de pollo has 36% more protein (22 g vs 14 g).
- Only Kebab de pollo lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Klassisk Kebab!
Nötkött (82 %)*, nötfett, vatten, salt, potatisfiber, lökpulver, naturliga aromer, stabiliseringsmedel (E450, E451), animaliskt protein av nöt, kryddor, druvsocker, socker, vitlök. *Ursprung: Sverige
Kebab de pollo
Carne de pollo (86%); Agua; Aglutinante (proteína de SOJA, estabilizador (E-450) y harina de patata); Sal; Especias y extracto de especias, jarabe de glucosa, azúcar, aromas, hierbas y tomate; Extracto de levadura y maltodextrina.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Klassisk Kebab! or Kebab de pollo?
Overall, Kebab de pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kebab de pollo has fewer calories: 201 kcal versus 306 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kebab de pollo has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.