Kiri 72p vs Campo verde
Overall, Kiri 72p has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kiri 72p | Campo verde |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 230 kcal | 277 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 19 g |
| Saturated fat | 13 g | 9 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 7 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 9 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 9 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kiri 72p has 17% fewer calories (230 kcal vs 277 kcal).
- Campo verde has 31% less saturated fat (9 g vs 13 g).
- Kiri 72p has 71% less sugar (2 g vs 7 g).
- Campo verde has 47% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.6 g).
- Kiri 72p has 44% more protein (9 g vs 5 g).
- Only Campo verde lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Kiri 72p
Not available.
Campo verde
vegetable fat (non hydrogenated palm oil), buttermilk powder, skimmed cheese, whey, cheese, thickeners (E1442, E407), emulsifying salts (E452, E450, E339, E331), salt, flavor, preservatives (E202, E234), acidity regulator (E330).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kiri 72p or Campo verde?
Overall, Kiri 72p has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kiri 72p has fewer calories: 230 kcal versus 277 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kiri 72p has less sugar: 2 g versus 7 g per 100 g.