Comparison
Kelloggs vs Blat inflat amb mel
Overall, Blat inflat amb mel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kelloggs | Blat inflat amb mel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 380 kcal | 375 kcal |
| Fat | 1.9 g | 1.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 33 g | 37 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5.5 g | 7 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 9.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Blat inflat amb mel has 26% less fat (1.4 g vs 1.9 g).
- Kelloggs has 11% less sugar (33 g vs 37 g).
- Blat inflat amb mel has 21% more fiber (7 g vs 5.5 g).
- Only Kelloggs lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Kelloggs
67% _Weizen_, Zucker, Glukosesirup, 2% Honig, Sonnenblumenöl
Blat inflat amb mel
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kelloggs or Blat inflat amb mel?
Overall, Blat inflat amb mel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Blat inflat amb mel has fewer calories: 375 kcal versus 380 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kelloggs has less sugar: 33 g versus 37 g per 100 g.