Kayseri sucuk vs Chick'n croc
Overall, Kayseri sucuk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kayseri sucuk | Chick'n croc |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 367 kcal | 458 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 34 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.4 g | 5.5 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 34 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kayseri sucuk has 20% fewer calories (367 kcal vs 458 kcal).
- Kayseri sucuk has 12% less fat (30 g vs 34 g).
- Kayseri sucuk has 18% less saturated fat (14 g vs 17 g).
- Kayseri sucuk has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Kayseri sucuk has 56% less salt (2.4 g vs 5.5 g).
- Chick'n croc has 41% more protein (34 g vs 20 g).
Ingredients
Kayseri sucuk
Viande de boeuf, sel, melange depices, dextrose, exhausteur de gout E621, antioxydant E301, tarka um conservateur E250, colorant E162 Peau non comestible Pour mne urst fabriquer 100g de saucisse à l’ail, il a fallu 125g de viande boeuf.
Chick'n croc
Viande de poulet Halal (origine UE), huile de tournesol, graisse végétale (tournesol, noix de coco, karité, colza), sel, jalapeño rouge (5%) sirop de glucose, épices, dextrose, antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium, conservateur : nitrite de sodium, ferments de maturation, fumée au bois de hêtre
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kayseri sucuk or Chick'n croc?
Overall, Kayseri sucuk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kayseri sucuk has fewer calories: 367 kcal versus 458 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kayseri sucuk has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.