Chick'n croc vs Tavuk Salam
Overall, Tavuk Salam has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chick'n croc | Tavuk Salam |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 458 kcal | 218 kcal |
| Fat | 34 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 5.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 5.5 g | 25 g |
| Protein | 34 g | 9.8 g |
| Additives | 2 | 6 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tavuk Salam has 52% fewer calories (218 kcal vs 458 kcal).
- Tavuk Salam has 47% less fat (18 g vs 34 g).
- Tavuk Salam has 69% less saturated fat (5.3 g vs 17 g).
- Chick'n croc has 78% less salt (5.5 g vs 25 g).
- Chick'n croc has 71% more protein (34 g vs 9.8 g).
Ingredients
Chick'n croc
Viande de poulet Halal (origine UE), huile de tournesol, graisse végétale (tournesol, noix de coco, karité, colza), sel, jalapeño rouge (5%) sirop de glucose, épices, dextrose, antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium, conservateur : nitrite de sodium, ferments de maturation, fumée au bois de hêtre
Tavuk Salam
Viande de poulet séparé mécaniquement 37%, graisse de poulet, eau, viande de poulet 13%, collagène de poulet, farine de blé, sel, stabilisant (E450, E452), mélange de fines herbes et d'épices, exhausteur de goût (E621), antioxydant (E300, E316), légumes séchés (ail), conservateur (E250)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chick'n croc or Tavuk Salam?
Overall, Tavuk Salam has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tavuk Salam has fewer calories: 218 kcal versus 458 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tavuk Salam has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.