Kanelbullar vs Cupcakes marbrés au beurre
Overall, Kanelbullar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kanelbullar | Cupcakes marbrés au beurre |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 340 kcal | 397 kcal |
| Fat | 8.9 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 9.2 g |
| Sugars | 20 g | 28.7 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 6.4 g | 5.6 g |
| Additives | 3 | 8 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kanelbullar has 14% fewer calories (340 kcal vs 397 kcal).
- Kanelbullar has 55% less fat (8.9 g vs 20 g).
- Kanelbullar has 82% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 9.2 g).
- Kanelbullar has 30% less sugar (20 g vs 28.7 g).
- Kanelbullar has 45% less salt (0.4 g vs 0.7 g).
- Kanelbullar has 13% more protein (6.4 g vs 5.6 g).
- Kanelbullar has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Cupcakes marbrés au beurre lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Kanelbullar
Vetemjöl, kanelfyllning 18% (socker. vatten. farinsocker. modifierad potatisstärkelse, rapsolja, kanel. potatisgranulat. glukossirap. vetemjöl. vegetabiliskt emulgeringsmedel (E471), salt. arom (vanillin)), vatten, sirap, rapsolja. jäst. pärlsocker (socker, fullhärdad rapsolja). skallat havremjöl, brödglans (vatten. stärkelsesirap av majs, potatisdextrin, konserveringsmedel E211). salt. mald kardemumma, malt av korn, emulgeringsmedel (E471), mjölbehandlingsmedel (askorbinsyra).
Cupcakes marbrés au beurre
Sucre, FARINE DE BLÉ, CEUFS DE POULES ÉLEVÉES AU SOL, huile de palme, BEURRE 4,6%, huile de colza, stabilisant E422, eau, poudre de cacao maigre* 1,1%, émulsifiants E471 E475, poudres à lever E450 E500, fécule de pommes de terre, huile de noix de coco, conservateurs E202 E281, sel, arôme naturel, épaississant E415. Peut contenir SEIGLE, ORGE, AVOINE, SOJA.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kanelbullar or Cupcakes marbrés au beurre?
Overall, Kanelbullar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kanelbullar has fewer calories: 340 kcal versus 397 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kanelbullar has less sugar: 20 g versus 28.7 g per 100 g.