Kanan Koipireisi Marinoitu vs Haut de cuisse poulet les accessibles le gaulois
Overall, Haut de cuisse poulet les accessibles le gaulois has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Kanan Koipireisi Marinoitu
Haut de cuisse poulet les accessibles le gaulois
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kanan Koipireisi Marinoitu | Haut de cuisse poulet les ac... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 160 kcal | 221 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.4 g | 5 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Chicken | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kanan Koipireisi Marinoitu has 28% fewer calories (160 kcal vs 221 kcal).
- Kanan Koipireisi Marinoitu has 29% less fat (12 g vs 17 g).
- Kanan Koipireisi Marinoitu has 32% less saturated fat (3.4 g vs 5 g).
- Haut de cuisse poulet les accessibles le gaulois has 82% less salt (0.2 g vs 1 g).
- Haut de cuisse poulet les accessibles le gaulois has 18% more protein (17 g vs 14 g).
- Haut de cuisse poulet les accessibles le gaulois has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Kanan Koipireisi Marinoitu lists: Chicken.
Ingredients
Kanan Koipireisi Marinoitu
Chicken (87%)
Haut de cuisse poulet les accessibles le gaulois
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kanan Koipireisi Marinoitu or Haut de cuisse poulet les accessibles le gaulois?
Overall, Haut de cuisse poulet les accessibles le gaulois has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kanan Koipireisi Marinoitu has fewer calories: 160 kcal versus 221 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Haut de cuisse poulet les accessibles le gaulois has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.