Comparison

Hauts de cuisses de poulet au paprika vs Haut de cuisse poulet les accessibles le gaulois

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHauts de cuisses de poulet a...Haut de cuisse poulet les ac...
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 195 kcal 221 kcal
Fat 13 g 17 g
Saturated fat 3.8 g 5 g
Sugars 0.7 g 0 g
Salt 1.2 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0 g
Protein 17 g 17 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Hauts de cuisses de poulet au paprika has 12% fewer calories (195 kcal vs 221 kcal).
  • Hauts de cuisses de poulet au paprika has 24% less fat (13 g vs 17 g).
  • Hauts de cuisses de poulet au paprika has 24% less saturated fat (3.8 g vs 5 g).
  • Haut de cuisse poulet les accessibles le gaulois has no sugar, while Hauts de cuisses de poulet au paprika has 0.7 g.
  • Haut de cuisse poulet les accessibles le gaulois has 85% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Hauts de cuisses de poulet au paprika has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Haut de cuisse poulet les accessibles le gaulois has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Hauts de cuisses de poulet au paprika

Découpes de poulet 95%, épices (dont paprika), plantes aromatiques, sel, semoule de riz, tomate, sucre, arômes naturels.

Haut de cuisse poulet les accessibles le gaulois

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Hauts de cuisses de poulet au paprika or Haut de cuisse poulet les accessibles le gaulois?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Hauts de cuisses de poulet au paprika has fewer calories: 195 kcal versus 221 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Haut de cuisse poulet les accessibles le gaulois has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons